It's a timeless question: rent or buy? Thanks to a new report, we never have to think about this question again. (Kidding, kidding.)
A new joint report from real estate data provider PropertyShark and rental site RentCafe studied the savings of homeowners versus renters in the nation's 50 largest cities, and found some surprising trends. In general, renters are rarely able to save money — but that's not always the case.
Fort Worth was one of only 12 cities in the country where renters are able to put away some cash every month, about $131 on average. While that not seem like much, it's a fortune compared to what renters face in other cities around the country.
Overall, renters in Texas are in better shape than most states. Though it's the most expensive city in Texas, Austin came in at No. 1 among all Texas cities with a savings of $265, and No. 2 in the U.S. (Only Virginia Beach, Virginia, with an average monthly saving of $883, fared better than Austin.)
San Antonio grabbed the No. 2 spot — fifth in the nation — with a monthly savings of $163 per month. Fort Worth came in third in Texas. Houston and Dallas rounded out Texas' top five with a monthly savings of $66 and $55, respectively.
Now this isn't to say renters in these cities save more money than homeowners. Those who own their homes are still in better financial shape than most renters, regardless of their city, the study determined.
So why do renters save less than owners? They're more likely to be single. "It’s understandable that renters earn less and are usually single, while a higher percentage of owners are married and have a heftier income, but just by looking at the numbers and sometimes seeing thousand-dollar differences is staggering," says the report.
In some cities — like Boston — the discrepancy is so staggering it's virtually impossible for single renter to save anything. In fact, Bostonian renters lose on average about $2,244 per month.